
Dr. Jing Li standing outside the EME building.
Dr. Jing Li is a lecturer in engineering communication. In recognition of International Women’s Day coming up on March 8, 2026, she is one of several women being spotlighted from the School of Engineering.
Tell us a bit about yourself. If you had to describe yourself in three sentences, what would you say?
I grew up in Kunming, the capital city of Yunnan Province in southwestern China. I then lived in different cities before coming to Canada in 2013 to pursue my PhD in Education at Simon Fraser University. Teaching has always been an important part of my professional identity, and my experiences working across disciplines and cultures has shaped how I teach. I draw on insights and best practices from engineering communication, education, writing studies, and applied linguistics to help engineering students communicate with clarity and impact.
If I were to describe myself in three sentences, I’d say that I’m a curious, life-long learner with an interdisciplinary and transnational background. I genuinely enjoy connecting with people across cultures and disciplines. Outside of work, I enjoy swimming and travelling.
I’m a curious, life-long learner with an interdisciplinary and transnational background. I genuinely enjoy connecting with people across cultures and disciplines.
What drew you to UBC Okanagan and the School of Engineering?
I joined the School of Engineering in 2022, but my connection with UBCO actually began in 2015, when I presented at a conference here during my PhD. My session was in the EME building, and I still remember standing inside the building, looking out through the large glass windows over the valley and distant mountains. While the view was striking, I had no idea at the time that I would one day return in a different role.
So, when I later saw a faculty position open, it felt like a natural return. That alignment between personal memory, natural environment, and professional opportunity is what ultimately drew me here. The School of Engineering is a wonderful community to be a part of and my time here has brought so many opportunities to meet and work with great people.
The School of Engineering is a wonderful community to be a part of and my time here has brought so many opportunities to meet and work with great people.
Tell us about your work.
Most of my work centers on teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in engineering and professional communication. I focus on helping engineering students develop communication competencies that align with the rhetorical, cognitive, and technical demands of their fields. Whether they write technical reports, deliver project pitches, or navigate workplace communication, I guide students in integrating technical clarity with audience awareness and contextual purpose.
Beyond teaching, I am also engaged in research on inclusive writing instruction. I’m currently a team member on a SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council) funded project in collaboration with colleagues from UBCO’s Faculty of Creative and Critical Studies and Simon Fraser University. The project addresses current issues in teaching first-year writing to multilingual students in Canada. As part of that work, we developed the PRISM Framework (Plurality, Raciolinguistics, Indigenous Worldviews and Social Justice for Multilingual Learners), which offers both a theoretical lens and a practical resource toolkit for writing and communication instructors and researchers.
What are the big questions you hope to answer – or problems you hope to solve – through your work?
One big question I hope to answer grows out of my work in engineering communication. Engineers do far more than solving technical problems. They design, collaborate, persuade, and make decisions that shape communities and the world. There is a deeply human, and even creative, dimension to engineering. One guiding question in my work is how we prepare engineering students to become not only technically competent, but also thoughtful, articulate, and responsive to the complex social contexts in which their work operates.
I’m also interested in how we teach communication effectively to engineering students whose cognitive training emphasizes structure, predictability, and rule-based problem-solving. Engineering students often excel at decomposing complex systems using predefined frameworks, but communication requires navigating ambiguity, interpretation, and interpersonal dynamics. My work explores how we can design pedagogies that build on engineers’ analytical strengths while intentionally scaffolding their capacity to operate in open-ended, socially negotiated contexts. This is especially important as engineering increasingly intersects with policy, business, and public engagement.
What courses do you teach?
I teach two undergraduate courses in engineering and technical communication, as well as a graduate course for Master of Engineering (MEng) students (Professional Communication for Engineering Leaders). I also teach engineering communication to first-year students in the UBC Vantage One Engineering Program. In these courses, I guide students to explore a range of academic and professional communication genres across written, oral, visual, and multimodal forms to develop communication competencies aligned with engineering practice.
How does your research influence your teaching?
I believe research and teaching are mutually reinforcing. My research shapes how I design learning experiences, and problems I observe in the classroom often generate new research questions. This reciprocal relationship ensures that my scholarship remains grounded in authentic learning contexts, while my teaching is continually shaped by evidence-based inquiry. For example, I’ve been working with colleagues at Simon Fraser University, using an argument visualization tool called Dmap – developed by a group of SFU researchers – to help engineering students visually map claims, evidence, counterarguments, rebuttals, and warrants. This work addresses common challenges students often face in constructing arguments, particularly in articulating counterarguments and making warrants explicit. By incorporating argument mapping into teaching, students learn to argue – by building coherent, persuasive arguments, and argue to learn – by deepening their understanding of course content.
March 8 is International Women’s Day. June 23 is International Day of Women in Engineering.
All throughout the year, the SoE is committed to celebrating and acknowledging the contributions and leadership of women in our engineering community.
As a woman working in engineering communication, how has your perspective shaped the way you support engineering students, and what changes are you seeing in the field today?
Coming from education, I’m used to working in classrooms that are more gender-balanced. In engineering, I’ve noticed that classroom composition can be quite different, with male students often forming the majority. Representation does shape classroom dynamics, particularly in discussion, group work, and leadership roles within teams.
I am intentional about designing participation structures to address these issues. Rather than leaving participation to emerge on its own, which can unintentionally reproduce imbalances, I try to make collaboration more structured and reflective so that all students have space to contribute in a comfortable and meaningful way. What I’ve seen over time is that when communication expectations are made explicit and roles are thoughtfully designed, students of all genders participate more confidently and equitably. Engineering education is gradually becoming more attentive to these dynamics, and I see that as a very positive shift.
I also think it’s important that students see diverse faculty in classrooms. Representation matters not only in student cohorts, but also in who is teaching and leading.
I try to make collaboration more structured and reflective so that all students have space to contribute in a comfortable and meaningful way.
What advice would you share with the next generation of women and underrepresented voices entering engineering?
During my time in the School of Engineering, I’ve had the privilege of working with many remarkable engineering students – including women, international students, and those from underrepresented backgrounds. They are smart, confident and articulate. Watching their growth and leadership gives me great confidence that the next generation of women and underrepresented voices in engineering will make outstanding contributions to the field.
Building on that, my advice would be this: do not underestimate the value of your perspective and voice. You belong in engineering not in spite of your background, but because of it. The field increasingly depends on people who can think across cultures, disciplines, and communities. Your ability to navigate complexity and difference is not peripheral; it is central to where engineering is heading. Also, remember that engineering itself is evolving – the field is expanding to include ethics, stakeholder engagement, sustainability, equity, and more. This creates meaningful opportunities for diverse voices not just to participate, but to help shape what engineering becomes.
Do not underestimate the value of your perspective and voice. You belong in engineering not in spite of your background, but because of it.
Who inspires you?
Throughout my professional journey, I’ve been inspired by many incredible women. One of the most influential is my PhD supervisor, Dr. Danièle Moore, who has remained both a lifelong mentor and friend. She modeled intellectual rigor, generosity, and integrity in ways that continue to shape how I approach my work today.
I’m also inspired by my colleagues in the School of Engineering and at UBCO – their dedication to students, openness to new ideas, and collegial support create a welcoming environment that continually stretches me to learn, adapt, and grow – both professionally and intellectually.
My students themselves are also a constant source of inspiration – their curiosity, passion, and successes remind me why this work matters. As much as I strive to motivate my students, their successes and appreciation of my work, in turn, are a driving force for me to plough straight on ahead!
My students themselves are also a constant source of inspiration – their curiosity, passion, and successes remind me why this work matters. As much as I strive to motivate my students, their successes and appreciation of my work, in turn, are a driving force for me to plough straight on ahead!



Dr. Nahiduzzaman will deliver a talk entitled “Beyond Infrastructure: Toward Proactive and Systems-based Flood Risk Governance Integrating Local (indigenous) Knowledge.”
Dr. Ruan will deliver a talk entitled “Recent Development of Magnesium Carbonate Cements.”